Important Notice: We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024. If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact billing@hostonnet.com.
BRITISH-FORCES-CHAT Forum Index -> International forces -> USA GETS TOUGH ON OFFICERS

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  


Author Message
Tafscot
Guest






Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:00 am
PostPost subject: USA GETS TOUGH ON OFFICERS Reply with quote

Air Force, Army Discipline 17 For Improper Fuse Shipment

Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley says administrative actions "can carry . . . substantial consequences" for officers. (Haraz N. Ghanbari - AP)
?



Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 26, 2008; Page A19
The Air Force yesterday announced disciplinary actions against 15 officers -- six generals and nine colonels -- in connection with the mistaken shipment of four nuclear missile fuses to Taiwan in 2006, while the Army said it counseled two generals who had oversight of part of the faulty supply system.

One of the most severe punishments was a letter of reprimand sent to Air Force Lt. Gen. Kevin J. Sullivan, Air Force deputy chief of staff for logistics, for his failure to act to correct "systemic issues in ICBM [intercontinental ballistic missile] logistics," according to an Air Force statement. Letters of reprimand must be put in officers' personnel files as unfavorable information. Sullivan has requested retirement, the statement said.

Five other Air Force generals received less-severe letters of admonishment, which can be placed in their files and have "significant adverse effects on an officer's career," according to the Air Force. Those officers were Lt. Gen. Michael A. Hamel and Brig. Gen. Francis M. Bruno, who had previously requested retirement; Brig. Gen. Arthur B. Cameron III, who had been reassigned, unrelated to the incident; and Maj. Gens. Roger W. Burg and Kathleen D. Close, who will remain in command because the Air Force leadership determined that their skills are needed to "restore effective stewardship of the ICBM force."

Of the colonels, five received letters of reprimand, three letters of admonishment and one a letter of counsel.

"These actions are administrative in nature but can carry with them substantial consequences for the careers of these officers, including their potential to command, to be promoted or to retire in their current grade," acting Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley said at a Pentagon news briefing.

"We recognize the years of dedicated service that these officers have given, but we cannot ignore the breaches of trust that have occurred on their watch," he said.



Still, the Air Force chief of staff, Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, said some of the officers are being allowed to continue to serve because "they have unique skills" necessary for the nuclear weapons mission. Nevertheless, he warned: "They certainly are on notice that there is no room for error here and that, should they abuse this trust, it won't take but about a millisecond to react."

The two Army officers, Brig. Gens. Lynn A. Collyar and Michael J. Lally III, received nondisciplinary memorandums of concern. Both had commanded the Defense Distribution Center, which at certain times had responsibility for the misdirected boxes containing the nuclear missile fuses. The Army said that it had counseled the officers but that the action would not impact their careers and both continue to serve "with distinction
Back to top

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Free Web Hosting | File Hosting | Photo Gallery | Matrimonial


Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com